| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | Sep » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
- 5. February 2012: Indiana Doesn't Want Me, Lord I Can't Go Back There
- 22. November 2010: Rhode Island Blues
- 22. November 2010: New Jersey Devils
- 3. November 2010: Rocky Mountain High? (updated)
- 2. November 2010: Roll On!!
- 29. September 2010: Sunstein, Respected Legal Scholar (By Whom???)
- 29. September 2010: Nogales NM Mayor Indicted
- 13. September 2010: Finally, Something Good For Detroit!
- 13. September 2010: I Didn't Do It For You.
- 13. September 2010: Cuyahoga County Corruption (Say that three times fast)
Blogroll
Corruption Watch
I will be posting information regarding Federal political corruption charges and convictions under this category.
Some unwritten rules of the media to be aware of:
· If the subject is a Republican:
o Stories will be carried front-page, probably lead
o Every attempt will be made to present charges and allegations as fact
o Party affiliation will be mentioned prominently, and if possible multiple times
o Affiliations with prominent Republicans will be played up, and inferences of collusion will be made
o Association with the Tea Party or other groups that the left does not like will be inferred
· If the subject is a Democrat:
o Stories will be carried as far from the front page as possible
o Facts and even convictions will be presented as allegations
o Party affiliation will not be mentioned at all
o Affiliations with prominent Dems will be ignored or presented as inconsequential
o Association with nutroots groups such as DFA or MoveOn.org will be downplayed so as not to dirty the image of the subject’s benefactors
o
The party affiliation rule is very important. This will usually be the biggest clue to the political affiliation of the subject.
Satire V
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.